http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2channel#English_spinoffs

I'd like appeal to D A D D Y C O O L to ban the person who did this.

.　.　/￣|　　／|　 /￣|　　/￣| ＼ ／　/￣/　/￣/　/￣/　/
　　/　　.|　/＿/ /　　.|　/　　.|　 /　　/　　　/　 /　/　 /　/
　 /＿／／　/　/＿／ /＿／　/　　/＿/　/＿/　/＿/　/＿＿

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　/＼＿＿_／ヽ
　　　　〃ﾆ;;::`lヽ,,_　　　　　　　　　　　≡　 ／''''''　　　'''''':::::::＼　
　　 　〈 (lll!! ﾃ-;;;;ﾞfn　　　　__,,--､_　　..　 . |（●）,　　　､（●）､.:|　＋　≡
　　　／ヽ-〃;;;;;;;llllll7,,__／"　　＼三=ー　|　　 ,,ﾉ(､_, )ヽ､,,　.::::|　　 　　≡
　　　>､/:::/＜;;;lllメ　　　＼ヾ、　　ヽTf=ヽ`　　 ｀-=ﾆ=- '　.:::::::|　+
　　j,,　ヾて）r=- | ヾ:　　 :ヽ;;: 　　　 | l |　 l ＼　　｀ﾆﾆ´　 .:::::／　　　　　+　　≡
,ｲ　ヽ二)l(_,＞"　l|　　　 ::＼;:: 　　　| |　 |　　ヽ,,-‐、i'　　／ V
　i、ヽ--ｲll"/　,, ,//,,　　　　:;;　　　l //　 l く> /::l"'i::lll1-=::::￣＼
　ヾ＝=:"::^::;;:::／;;;;;;;;;:::::::::::::: :::::ゞ ﾉ/　　 L／〈:::t_ｲ::/ll|─-=＝　ヾ
　　＼__::::::::／::::::::::::＿;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;ノノ　　　ﾍ　　　>(ﾞ ）l:::l-┴ヾ、ヽ　 ）
　　　　 ￣~~￣￣／　:::|T==--:::::　 ／／　　/　ﾄ=-|:|-─ （ l　　 /
　　　　　　　　 ／　::　 ::l l::::::::::::::::::/ /:::::::::::/:::::(ヽ--─　 /　|　 /
　　　　　　　　 ヽ＿=--"⌒￣ﾞﾞヾ:/ /:::::::／:::::::::`<==--　ﾉ　/　/
　　　　　　　　　／　　　／　　　＼/:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::￣'''""::／／
　　　　　　　 ／　　　／　　　　 :::: ヾ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::べ__;;;--"

This probably won't increase traffic anyways. ('A` )

>>4
Like we get any traffic other than 3 people anyway.

TRILLIONS

AND BEYOND

>>6,7
Why did you "sage", now nobody will see your posts? :(

I sage every post as a courtesy.

Interesting, i just noticed this recently as well.

I doubt many would care anyway, not many come along and read the 2channel wiki.

>>11
That's vandalism.

I support >>11's decision.

I almost removed it too, but then decided against it. It's not like the secret entrance is secret anymore.

I propose that we sent a mail to Wikipedia and let them link SaoVQ if they payus enough ;)

Not sure why it should be removed now, mainly in response to http://www.secretareaofvipquality.net/saovq/kareha.pl/1213505692/l50

Although i still think gaining more popularity to this place is a very dodgy idea, once it happens, and some idiot finds out, all hell will break loose....

>>18
And then the bans flow...

>>19
True, but the board will still suffer quite badly.
Not sure how well the servers run either, could get so bad the servers timeout, and that would be very bad ._.

Speaking of which, I propose to take down the imageboard. It's almost dead. Doing so would free some dataforce that could be used to implement some more successful VIP Quality solutions.

>>20
I think your overestimating how popular it will become. There are definitely limits.

>>22 Eh, i guess you are right.

But the imageboard might get flooded by /b/.

>>23
Nah, the /b/tards wouldn't be attracted to a dead board. They could carry out a single, two-hour offensive once, and give up then.

>>24
In b4 we are raided by /b/tards.