[Science] ITT Science-related news and discussion [Future!] (6)

1 Name: VIPPER : 2008-07-17 18:43 [Del]

||￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣
||
||　　　　　Ｘ　e = mc^2
||
||　　　　　　　 ○　e = mc^bun
||　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　 　 　 ｡　　∧＿∧
||　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　＼（＾ω＾　）　Post Science related stuff in here!
||　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　 ⊂　⊂　）旦~　　
||＿＿＿∧ ∧＿＿_∧ ∧＿＿_ ∧ ∧＿＿ ∧ ∧＿＿＿|￣￣￣￣￣￣￣|
　　　 　 (　 ∧ ∧__ (　　∧ ∧(　 　 ∧ ∧(　　 ∧ ∧　 ￣￣￣￣￣￣￣
　　　〜（＿(　∧ ∧（　 (　　∧ ∧＿ (　 ∧ ∧＿ (　　∧ ∧
　　　　 〜（＿(　 　,,)〜（＿(　 　,,)〜（＿(　 　,,)〜（＿( 　 　,) 　
　　　　　　 〜（＿__ﾉ　　〜（＿__ﾉ　　 〜（＿__ﾉ　　 〜（＿__ﾉ 　

2 Name: VIPPER : 2008-07-17 19:11 [Del]

Have you read your Structure and Interpretation of Classical Mechanics today?

3 Name: VIPPER : 2008-07-17 19:17 [Del]

>>2
HO-HOLY SHIT?! I never knew this even existed. What the fuck is this anyways? And how the hell does Sussman know this much about physics too? I am reading this ASAP.

4 Name: VIPPER : 2008-07-17 19:35 [Del]

>>3
his job description is professor of electrical engineering, so it isn't too far fetched.
much as i sympathize with his frustrations with traditional mathematical expression, to write a textbook on physics using a better notation is extraordinarily odd.

& to contribute:
there will be no technological singularity. sorry guys.

5 Name: VIPPER : 2008-07-17 19:41 [Del]

>>4
Do you really think there NEVER will be? There has to eventually be singularity, even if it's a thousand years away. Unless you're saying we all die out before then.

6 Name: VIPPER : 2008-07-17 22:19 [Del]

>>5
It's a fantasy by lardarses who would rather have shiny toys than improve themselves. Because the latter involves hard work, and the former involves many twinkies and waiting and then going out and buying said toys.

Sorry, no bonus.
Return Entire thread Last 50 posts
Name: Link:
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
More options...
Verification: