>>6

I would like to interject here and state that some ways and forms of spamming are rather VIP. Tablecat, for example, will only amuse many VIPPERS (though not all) through its overabundance. Personally, I find the drivel churned out by spambots to be enjoyable in the same sense that VIPPERS enjoy the merits of Aria Giovanni fisting, Helen Keller simulators, and admission to FairX's secret area of hax.

However, you most certainly have a strong point. JEWS threads aren't much of a contribution to the VIPcoin-fueled economy that is our Secret Area, and there isn't much humor to be had in the AnonTalk spam itself (though I feel that you can observe its creator's gradual decline from a mere accusation to trolling to paranoid delusion and desperation, making the AnonTalk spam incredibly depressing). Furthermore, it can be worse: /a/'s children's-card-game counterpart to the Jackson 5 GET isn't the slightest bit funny, but it seduces DQN into arbitrarily obtaining any and all instances of the number 5.

To defeat the Jackson 5 GET, one must not merely think about spam or GETs in the sense of the GET, but feel them. Consider the grieving the Jackson 5 have felt during the trials of their most famous member. Visualize how the Jackson family suffered through the publicized death of said famous member. Now, imagine all of these feelings, the opera of the entire Jackson family, summoned every time a naïve VIPPER sacrifices the fifth post of a thread in their name. Suddenly, the Jackson 5 GET is a beast more morbid than any pharaoh that can best a Blue-Eyes White Dragon. This will no longer be a question of quality, but a question of ethics.

And when an unsuspecting VIPPER GETs the final sacrifice required to bring whatever wicked scheme the Jackson 5 have devised, presumably the scenario outlined in Thriller, I will be here to do battle.